*Home * About Us * Contact Us * Donations * Support Group Meetings * Links * JOIN US ! (free) *Archives *

OPMC Reform

Signed by Gov. Paterson 2008


NYS Doctors are Offered Some Protection


Empire State Lyme Informational Brochures (free)-also, you can ask for a customized version for your group


Tick- Info Plus (Download 97 page Tick Management free)


Lyme and Tick-

Borne Disease Info

· The Beginning

· Rashes

· Early Detection 

· Testing

· Symptoms

· Additional Symptoms

· Co-infections

· Late stage Infection

· Antibiotics

· Treatment

· Herxheimer Reaction

· Mechanism of Action

· Survival Tactics

· The Bad News 

· Conclusion

· Good News

· Prevention

· Alternative Treatments

· Lyme Disease Politics

· Disclaimer




Lyme tests are not accurate-2005 John Hopkins study


Articles on the Persistence and Virulence of Lyme

by Miklossy, Luft, Barthold,  others


*Support Group Meetings*


Empire State Lyme en Espańol


Michele Moynihan's Presentation "Lyme Disease: Be Lyme Wise* is a Great Educational Presentation for School Children 



on Tick-Borne Diseases plus


and The Third Great Plague



Autism and Lyme Disease


LYME & Pregnancy by John Drulle, MD



Alzheimer's and Lyme Disease

ALS and Lyme




Worm Parasites, FILARIASIS Nematodes in ticks?

Nematode Spirochete Farmers

Nematode-Bacteria- Symbiosis

10 Questions For Scientists


Heart Disease & Lyme Disease & Lyme Carditis






**Senator Schumer, on Board of Empire State Lyme Disease Association**



*Contact Us*

*About Us

JOIN US ! (free)








Freedom of Information Law Requests

2010 Federal Health Reform

Implementation Timeline


Special Thanks


In Memory

of Keith Romaine 




 Lyme Activism in NY

OPMC Reform is a reality as of August 5, 2008 when Governor Patterson signed what has now become known as "The Patient Safety" Law.  (Click here to read the law with explanations)  We extend our deepest gratitude to Assemblyman Richard Gottfried, the New York State Legislature and Governor Paterson and to everyone who has worked so hard over the years to gain protection for our doctors. The struggle for OPMC Reform in New York State began in 2001 when one NYS doctor, who treated Lyme disease aggressively, had his license taken away and others treating Lyme disease were also investigated and then charged by the Office of Professional Medical Conduct.  The first thing we activists did was to convince legislators to hold public hearings.  The hearings on November 27, 2001 and January 31, 2002 gained strong support for chronic Lyme patients.  AS A RESULT OF THE HEARINGS, NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 2155 PASSED BY UNANIMOUS FLOOR VOTE ON APRIL 22, 2002.

After 2002 patients who have Lyme doctors with practices in New York traveled to Albany to ask the NYS Legislature for OPMC Reform for years up to and including the year 2008.  

In 2008 due to working on federal legislation some NY patients decided not to go to Albany to advocate, but others did go in 2008.  Those of us who went to Albany re-emphasized our plight to let legislators know that we needed their continued commitment to help us.  As advocates, we focused on creating friendships and we continued to raise awareness.  

Then, in 2008, we got all our OPMC Reforms within the Patient Safety Law!  It was wonderful news!  To explain, Governor Patterson had called for a law for "Patient Safety" because in November 2007,  a NYS doctor was found to have reused syringes which caused patients to be at risk for both AIDS and Hepatitis C.  

Assemblyman Gottfried saw the Governor's call for a Patient Safety Law as an opportunity to have the OPMC Reforms written into Patient Safety: the very due process clauses that we have supported for years were included.  F
or "patients' safety," Governor Patterson wanted a provision that allows the OPMC to publicize when they charge a physician with medical misconduct.  However, specific provisions in the law would only allow publication of charges against a physician after an investigation committee within the OPMC, comprised of two physicians and one lay person, has reviewed the evidence collected through the investigation and has determined by majority vote that a hearing is warranted. The vast majority of complaints never reach this stage.  Importantly, publication of the charges is only permitted "when there is a unanimous vote of the investigation committee that a hearing is warranted. Further, the law states, that if the investigation committee is not unanimous in its vote for a hearing, the members of the committee must vote a second time on whether to make the charges public. If that second vote is not unanimous, then the charges cannot be made public."

Doctors now have the right to present scientific evidence in their own defense and they also have all the other due process rights provided for in A11136.  This will be of great help in protecting our doctors.

Please note that these rights will be additional to the directive already written by the OPMC director that Lyme disease doctors could not be tried because they do not share the mainstream view about Lyme disease treatment which was written in 2005 to broaden Article 131 of the NYS Education Law (1994).

Although there was some disagreement about whether or not patients should have gone to Albany in 2008 to advocate for Lyme disease issues, and some patients went and some stayed home, the majority of patients now agree that we are in good shape.  We now have "a fair and intelligent reconciliation of the objectives of public protection and physician due process." We do hope that, as promised, it will be monitored to make certain that these objectives are realized. 

So, OPMC Reform is a reality and Governor Patterson signed what has now become known as "The Patient Safety" Law.  We extend our deepest gratitude to Assemblyman Richard Gottfried, the New York State Legislature and Governor Patterson and to everyone who has worked so hard over the years to gain protection for our doctors.


Additionally, in June, 2008, posted by one of our own doctors, one who was involved in OPMC proceedings:

"Please note: The Truth About the Infection Control/OPMC Bill, before you get discouraged by reading misleading articles in Newsday, please read the truth about the soon to be passed Infection Control/OPMC bill."  See below:

Posted from MSSNY, THE MEDICAL SOCIETY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 420 Lakeville Road, Lake Success, New York, 11042 on Wed., June 25, 2008 

Negotiations have concluded in a three-way agreement on legislation A.11136 (Gottfried)/S.8298 (Hannon) addressing infection control practices and the procedures and operations of the office of professional medical conduct.

The bill balances additional due process protections for physicians with modest changes to the procedures and operations of the office of professional medical conduct (OPMC).

The following is a brief description of the important provisions of the initial proposal along with a summary of the final terms within the approved legislation. Unlike what you often read in the newspaper this information is accurate.

Making charges public

The several facets of the bill which have enjoyed much press attention include provisions which would make public the charges served against a physician. It is important to note first that charges are served only after an investigation committee within OPMC, comprised of two physicians and one lay person, has reviewed the evidence collected through the investigation and determines by a majority vote that a hearing is warranted. The vast majority of complaints never reach this stage. (Of the over 8000 complaints filed with OPMC last year, less then four hundred resulted in a hearing). Importantly, MSSNY secured changes in the legislation which now permit publication of the charges only when there is a unanimous vote of the investigation committee that a hearing is warranted. Further, the bill states, that if the investigation committee is not unanimous in its vote for a hearing, the members of the committee must vote a second time on whether to make the charges public. If that second vote is not unanimous, then the charges cannot be made public.

HMO Duty to Report

Provisions had been included in the original bill which would have required HMOs to report termination of a physician's contract premised on "alleged incompetence or malpractice". These provisions were removed at MSSNY's urging from the bill.

Random and Unannounced Surveillance Visits

Provisions in one of the physician discipline bills actively considered by the legislature would have allowed the DOH to conduct random and unannounced surveillance visits to the offices of private and public health care providers. These provisions were not incorporated in the agreed to bill.

Professional Misconduct for Failure to Display a Poster About OPMC

Provisions in the original discipline bill would have required physicians to post in their offices an official OPMC notice containing information on how to access physician profiles and OPMC disciplinary actions and would have made non-compliance an act of professional misconduct. The approved bill removes the poster requirement. Instead the physicians will only be required to display a pamphlet which the Commissioner will develop which describes a variety of department programs including the DOH smoking cessation program, public health insurance program, health and quality improvement information, the patient safety center and physician profiles. Physicians must make the pamphlet available in their reception area.

Access to Licensee Medical Records

The original bill would have allowed OPMC to more easily obtain a physician's own personal medical records if there is reason to believe that he or she may be impaired by alcohol, drugs, physical disability or mental disability. A line of court cases already permit such access when such records are subpoenaed by the BPMC. The agreed to bill limits access to such records only to instances where the record may be relevant to the alleged impairment or relevant to an inquiry into a report of a communicable disease. No order seeking to obtain access to such records can be served until the licensee is notified and provided an opportunity to be heard.

Enhanced Infection Control and Improved Investigation Practices

The approved bill continues the current requirement that physicians complete infection control training every four years but adds an additional course component on Hepatitis C transmission, requires that the course be updated on a proactive basis and extends the requirement for completing the course to medical school students, residents, and physician assistant students.

The approved bill would require licensees to report any suspected 'health care disease transmission' originating in their practices to the patient safety center within one day of becoming aware of such suspected transmission. Health care disease transmission is specifically defined under the bill to mean "the transmission of a reportable communicable disease that is blood borne from a health care professional to a patient or between patients as a result of improper infection control practices by the health care professional".

The approved bill authorizes DOH to disclose information to the public as needed regarding public health threats that come to light in the course of an OMPC investigation, notwithstanding otherwise applicable confidentiality provisions.

The approved bill states that the failure to respond to record requests by the State or local health department in conjunction with an inquiry into a report of a communicable disease constitutes professional medical misconduct. This is designed to facilitate communicable disease investigations.

The approved bill requires DOH to conduct a study and issue a report by January 1, 2009 as to whether restricting the use of multi-dose vials for the packaging of medications and requiring the use of disposable medical equipment engineered for single use is viable.

The Newsday Article Fails To Set Forth The Additional Physician Due Process Protections Described Below Which Have Been Incorporated in The Agreed To Bill.

1) Additional language was added to enhance due process for physicians. Specifically, the language would require that:

  • 20 days prior to the interview, a licensee must have written notice of:
    • a description of the conduct that is the subject of the investigation
    • the timeframe of the conduct under investigation
    • the identity of each patient whose contact with or care by licensee is believed to be relevant to the investigation
    • the fact that a licensee may be represented by counsel and may be accompanied by a stenographer. (Transcription costs are borne by the licensee and the state must be provided a copy of the transcript within 30 days of the interview). (Statutory authorization of use of stenographer is NEW although by letter dated in 2005, OPMC effectuate this practice.)
    • the licensee may submit medical or scientific literature that is materially relevant to the issues that have been identified by OPMC at any time
  • Within 30 days after the interview, or in a case where a stenographer was present at the interview, within fifteen days after OPMC receives a copy of the transcript, a licensee must be provided with a copy of the interviewer's report.
  • Licensee must be promptly given written notice of issues identified subsequent to the interview. (Currently a licensee must be given written notice of issues identified subsequent to the interview )
  • Requires that if the Director determines that the matter shall be submitted to an IC, the IC must be convened within 90 days of the interview.
  • If an investigation committee (IC) is convened, the Director of OPMC must provide the IC with relevant documentation including but not limited to: the original complaint; the report of the interviewer and the stenographic record if one was taken; the report of any medical or scientific expert; copies of relevant patient records and a report of any record review; the licensee's submissions; and any relevant medical or scientific literature.
  • If the Director determines to close an investigation following an interview, the OPMC must notify the licensee in writing.

2) Language was also added to incorporate a specific statutory requirement that would require OPMC to provide the licensee with any information or documentation in the possession of the OPMC which tends to prove the licensee's innocence. This obligation becomes effective after service of the charges upon the licensee and is expressly stated to be a continuing obligation on OPMC. Although there is no current requirement, there is a letter opinion which had been issued by DOH counsel several years ago which requires such disclosure to be made.

3) Additionally, language was added to provide a licensee with an avenue to re-open consideration of a closed disciplinary proceeding. The licensee may file a petition with the Director of OPMC who must review the matter and after consulting with counsel determine whether there is new and material evidence that was not previously available which, had it been available, would likely have led to a different result or whether circumstances have occurred subsequent to the original determination that warrant a reconsideration of the measure of discipline. If the Director agrees to join the licensee in the application, the Chair of the BPMC must decide to grant or deny the application.

This application process is not available to a licensee against whom a penalty of revocation of license or annulment of license or registration is imposed.

In summary this bill is a fair and intelligent reconciliation of the objectives of public protection and physician due process. Moreover, it will be monitored closely as its provisions become operational to make certain that these objectives are realized. 

Newsday Article June 21, 2008:


June 21, 2008

Doctor discipline bill may hinge on malpractice changes

| michael.amon@newsday.com

Passage of a landmark physician discipline bill may hinge on whether state lawmakers and Gov. David A. Paterson also can agree on a package of proposals long desired by doctors to reduce the risk of lawsuits and their malpractice insurance costs.

Defying Paterson on a bill he proposed, state Republican lawmakers said they want to address not only disciplinary matters but also rising malpractice insurance premiums that have driven doctors out of business.

"There is an urgent need to address malpractice costs as they are affecting the consumer on Long Island and New York City," said Sen. Kemp Hannon (R-Garden City), chairman of the Senate Health Committee. Malpractice insurance premiums increased 14 percent last year and then 15 percent this year.

A Paterson administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity said the governor opposed linking physician discipline and malpractice costs. Supporters of Paterson 's bill said the compromise efforts were an attempt to defeat the legislation, as another powerful lobby, trial lawyers, opposes many efforts at tort reform, that is, changes in malpractice law more favorable to doctors.

"It's the kind of horse trading that should be rejected," said Blair Horner, legislative director for the New York Public Interest Research Group. "It's a strategy to either kill or change the proposal."

Lawmakers met administration officials Friday afternoon but reached no agreement, Hannon said. The meeting comes as time runs out for the discipline measure this regular legislative session, which is due to adjourn Monday. The legislature may reconvene next month but would be busy addressing the budget, Hannon said.

Paterson 's bill would give the state Department of Health more power in conducting probes of physicians, make public the charges of professional misconduct filed against doctors, and require the state to investigate doctors with long malpractice histories. It came after criticism of the state's handling of the Dr. Harvey Finkelstein case on Long Island .

Physicians oppose parts of the bill. They would be "100 percent behind" a patient safety bill that includes insurance premium relief and changes in malpractice law, said Dr. Michael Rosenberg, president of the Medical Society of the State of New York, which advocates for the state's 65,000 doctors. The Medical Society has begun a radio advertising campaign on the issue in Albany .

One compromise discussed Friday was having the Assembly pass a measure making it cheaper for physicians to qualify for state-funded excess liability coverage, said Sen. John Flanagan (R-East Northport), who sponsored a similar measure that passed the Senate in April.

Complicating matters is that a medical malpractice liability task force convened by former Gov. Eliot Spitzer has yet to make recommendations on insurance premiums or tort reform. "That's left everybody hanging," Hannon said.

 "Patient Safety/Infection Control/OPMC Bill.


“In summary this bill is a fair and intelligent reconciliation of the objectives of public protection and physician due process. Moreover, it will be monitored closely as its provisions become operational to make certain that these objectives are realized.”


Thanks to Assemblyman Gottfried and his dedicated staff who worked hard to  have due process features included. 

The following is further explanation of the bill with the portions in red reflecting Assemblyman Richard Gottfried’s due process features from his original OPMC Reform bill.  


A11136 Patient Safety Governor’s program bill (numbered in relation to the bill sections)

1. Permit a committee on professional conduct (CPC) to order a doc’s own medical record, upon notice and opportunity for hearing.  Cause for action:

·      Evidence of physical impairment

·      Mental impairment

·      Medical condition that may be related to report of transmission of communicable disease or HIV AIDS

    CPC may require clinical competency exams, upon notice and opportunity for hearing.

2. OPMC to report “acts or omissions” that constitute a crime to “law enforcement"

3. Exception to §230 confidentiality in case of communicable disease public health threat

4. Provides 20 day notice to licensee of a investigative interview including:

o     A description of the conduct of concern

o     The issues relating to the conduct of concern

o     The time frame of the conduct

o     The patient involved

o     That the licensee may bring a stenographer and be advised by counsel

·      With 30 days of investigative interview (or 15 after receipt of stenographic record) provide to licensee the report of the interviewer

·      Allow the licensee to submit written comments, expert opinion and medical and scientific literature

·      Director provides to the IC the following:

o     Copy of complaint

o     Interviewers report and stenographic record if taken

o     Expert reports if made

o     Patient record review

o     Licensee’s submissions

·      Notice to licensee if the case is not going to an IC (case closed)

·      OPMC work with patient safety center to monitor med mal  and evaluate for possible misconduct – no specific triggers:

o     Disposition

o     Frequency

o     Type

o     Amount awarded

o     Geographic region

o     Specialty etc…

5.  Require licensee’s counsel to be an attorney admitted in NYS

6. Making charges public

o     If the IC unanimously concurs on charges, the charges will be made public

o     If not unanimous on charges, the IC will vote on making charges public, if that vote is unanimous charges are public.

o     Charges made public not sooner than 5 business from service of charges to licensee

o     Service of charges will also notify licensees of publication

7. New Rule for disclosure of exculpatory evidence after charges, “as soon as practicable and on a continuing basis’

8. addition to public notice of final order informing of appeal process

9. 1) Upon revocation, surrender, actual suspension over 90 day, any forced closure of practice

o     , respondent to notify pas/hosps within 15 days, to refer to other doc and transfer records unless pas declines within 15 days, then to pa’s preferred doc. 

o      Respondent to transfer record or store and be liable for them under EdL.6530.

o      Respondent notifies OPMC of doc who accepts stored records (accepts liability too)

o      Respondent to advise DEA and surrender DEA license

o      Respondent to return NYS triple-scripts, destroy script pads, dispose of unused drugs.

10. New Rule for application to consider new evidence after close of case: “whether there is new and material evidence that was not preciously available which had it been available would likely have let to a different result.”

11. Adds communicable disease or HIV/AIDS transmission to causes for summary suspension.

12. Adds indemnification for ALJs under contract, not employed.

13. Adds completion of “rehabilitation” and “terms or conditions of the board” to the conditions for terminus of suspensions

14. Adds course work or training in infection control practices to requirements for privileges

15. Adds office-based transmission of communicable disease HIV/AIDSto reporting to patient safety center

16. Course work or training in infection control

17. Infection control guidelines developed by COH.

18 study on multi-use vials and disposable medical equipment

19. physician profile update required for registrations renewal

20 Pamphlet on variety of department programs from smoking cessation to physician profiles be available in doctor offices

21. Adds HCV to required infection-control course work

22. MD registration, requires attestation that the physician profile has been updated within prior 6 months

23. Definitions of misconduct --  ADD failure to notify patients and transfer records as would be required by.

24. Definition of misconduct  -- failure of course work in infection control

25.  Definition of misconduct  -- failure to honor within one day (except for good cause shown) , state or local DOH request for records in re: communicable disease

26 Courts to report “sentenced” MDs, PAs, SAs to OPMC



Doctors are Protected  OPMC Reform Signed by Gov. Paterson 2008 

OPMC Reform Patient Safety Law

Go here for More Lyme activism in NY

Article 131 NY Education Law

Occupational Lyme NYS Workers Comp 2008

Fred W Thiele applauds final passage of bill to cover Lyme and tick-borne disease under workers comp

Gov P Denies Workers Comp to occupationally contracted Lyme and tick-borne disease

Freedom of information law requests